Quibble over the UOForums rules

Magister_Returns · 8th February 2008, 03:23 PM

The forum rules state, "If a user decides to post slander, lies or rude remarks about UOForums,..."

Technically, posted slander would be libel

Flame on! (hey, at least I read the rules!)

~M

**Adam** · 8th February 2008, 03:29 PM

Oh hush

hehe

Know of a better way to word it? feel free to suggest.

Magister_Returns · 8th February 2008, 05:34 PM

How about:

"If a user posts false, rude or otherwise unchivalrous remarks about UOForums..."

'Unchivalrous' adds an air of sophistication, don't you think?

**Adam** · 8th February 2008, 05:35 PM

lol, nice

**Silverfoot** · 8th February 2008, 05:37 PM

ROFL, like I always said, hang around long enough and you'll see them pick on everything!

Nice comeback though!

**Adam** · 8th February 2008, 05:46 PM

I'm still fond of the Markeedragon one rule policy....."Don't be a dumbass"
heheh

**Ally** · 8th February 2008, 05:51 PM

Hehe well you know some people will still find loopholes on what a dumbass is

Arioch · 8th February 2008, 06:02 PM

define "dumbass" please...

**Queen Mum** · 8th February 2008, 06:02 PM

"Technically, posted slander would be libel "

Technically, it is symantics. The rules are rules, which are set forth by the daily moods of those who control the edit buttons!!

*bag of cookies for Magister for reading the ROC

**Queen Mum** · 8th February 2008, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arioch

define "dumbass" please...

oh I will give it a try ....

Pertaining to UO Forums (from my perspective) it would be ... someone who has the capability to read the ROC before they agree to them, but decides that they are either to busy, or it don't matter to them personally what the rules are, then wonders why their posts are either locked, deleted, or why they were banned.

8th February 2008, 03:23 PM	#1
Magister_Returns I PvP in Iraq Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,498 Gold: 19,904 My Mood: Thanks: 58 Thanked 99 Times in 69 Posts	Quibble over the UOForums rules The forum rules state, "If a user decides to post slander, lies or rude remarks about UOForums,..." Technically, posted slander would be libel Flame on! (hey, at least I read the rules!) ~M

8th February 2008, 03:29 PM	#2
Adam "Can Set Custom Title" Join Date: Oct 1990 Posts: 6,454 Gold: 3,043 Thanks: 61 Thanked 959 Times in 319 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules Oh hush hehe Know of a better way to word it? feel free to suggest.

8th February 2008, 05:34 PM	#3
Magister_Returns I PvP in Iraq Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 1,498 Gold: 19,904 My Mood: Thanks: 58 Thanked 99 Times in 69 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules How about: "If a user posts false, rude or otherwise unchivalrous remarks about UOForums..." 'Unchivalrous' adds an air of sophistication, don't you think?

8th February 2008, 05:35 PM	#4
Adam "Can Set Custom Title" Join Date: Oct 1990 Posts: 6,454 Gold: 3,043 Thanks: 61 Thanked 959 Times in 319 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules lol, nice

8th February 2008, 05:37 PM	#5
Silverfoot Mith'quessir Join Date: Mar 2005 Shard: Chesepeake Posts: 2,365 Gold: 9,690 My Mood: Blog Entries: 9 Thanks: 226 Thanked 161 Times in 96 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules ROFL, like I always said, hang around long enough and you'll see them pick on everything! Nice comeback though! "Careful what you wish for, You just might get it all.... And then some you don't want"

8th February 2008, 05:46 PM	#6
Adam "Can Set Custom Title" Join Date: Oct 1990 Posts: 6,454 Gold: 3,043 Thanks: 61 Thanked 959 Times in 319 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules I'm still fond of the Markeedragon one rule policy....."Don't be a dumbass" heheh

8th February 2008, 05:51 PM	#7
Ally The Couch Hottie Join Date: Aug 2004 Shard: Lake Austin, Atlantic Posts: 4,521 Gold: 15,025 My Mood: Thanks: 51 Thanked 25 Times in 22 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules Hehe well you know some people will still find loopholes on what a dumbass is

8th February 2008, 06:02 PM	#8
Arioch Join Date: Apr 2007 Shard: Lake Superior Posts: 533 Gold: 64,441 My Mood: Thanks: 135 Thanked 69 Times in 43 Posts	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules define "dumbass" please... Lord L'arr Hamerfeld

8th February 2008, 06:02 PM	#9
Queen Mum Lead Administrator Join Date: Mar 2005 Shard: Sonoma Posts: 3,096 Gold: 24,145 My Mood: Blog Entries: 21 Thanks: 154 Thanked 342 Times in 136 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 2	Re: Quibble over the UOForums rules "Technically, posted slander would be libel " Technically, it is symantics. The rules are rules, which are set forth by the daily moods of those who control the edit buttons!! *bag of cookies for Magister for reading the ROC

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
UOForums Holiday Deco Contest 2007/2008 (Information/Rules thread)	Adam	Contest Archive	5	1st January 2008 07:34 AM
Rules	Shimaro Takeda	Takeda Shousoku	0	28th May 2007 08:54 AM
T*T General Rules & Submission Rules Updated Inside	Tovladian Soltyr	Legends	0	27th February 2007 01:41 AM
Rules	Twothumb	Vesper (OOC Board)	3	25th September 2006 02:35 PM