Concerning the concerns about Punkbuster

**Tabbitha** · 20-06-2006, 04:05 PM

source taken from uo.com

We thought this announcement would incite quite a discussion, and yes, indeed, it did. There are some misconceptions I want to clear up and some key questions I want to make sure are answered. As you think about this change, please keep these items in mind (and I’m going to re-state some things I’ve already stated elsewhere)...

1. I completely understand concerns about computer security and privacy. I wouldn’t put PunkBuster on my own machine at home (yes, the one with all my financial and personal records) if I didn’t feel safe about it. PunkBuster has been around for 10 years and almost single-handedly saved the multiplayer shooter genre from being torn apart by hackers and cheaters. In that time, we can’t find one instance of someone’s privacy being violated. EA has sold millions of copies of the Battlefield franchise all over the world, and 90% of BF players play on PB protected servers. In all that time, not one person has submitted a valid customer service complaint about a privacy or security violation.
2. Everyone concerned about privacy should read PunkBuster’s privacy policy at ........
Keep in mind that if PunkBuster betrayed even one gamer’s trust, people would stop using it, game makers would stop supporting it, and it would be the end of that business. It is in PunkBuster’s best interest to protect the privacy of its players. They have been doing that for 10 years now with millions of satisfied customers.
3. UO’s subscription fees will not be going up.
4. We haven’t decided what shard or shards will be non-PunkBuster yet. We want to see the results from the beta test first, as well as collect feedback.
5. As for performance, let me re-state... If beta testing proves that PunkBuster has performance issues for a large number of players, we will consider another anti-cheat solution. Beta testing should start in mid-July.
6. As for the screenshots, it will only take shots of the actual game screen window, not anything else on your desktop. And, it does that only rarely. This feature of PunkBuster is mostly used to verify cheats that turns walls invisible or somehow alter the battleground to the cheaters advantage.

I hope that alleviates some of your concerns. I’m sure discussions and debate will continue, and we will continue to answer questions about this as often as we can.

Meanwhile, as for that other announcement, the in-game story cycle is getting very close to the moment of revelation. The last few steps will be challenging, but I’m betting players see the future before the end of June.

See you in Sosaria,

Darkscribe

20-06-2006, 04:05 PM	#1 (permalink)
Tabbitha Administrator Join Date: Mar 2006 Shard: Europa Posts: 5,452 Thanks: 9 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Concerning the concerns about Punkbuster source taken from uo.com We thought this announcement would incite quite a discussion, and yes, indeed, it did. There are some misconceptions I want to clear up and some key questions I want to make sure are answered. As you think about this change, please keep these items in mind (and I’m going to re-state some things I’ve already stated elsewhere)... 1. I completely understand concerns about computer security and privacy. I wouldn’t put PunkBuster on my own machine at home (yes, the one with all my financial and personal records) if I didn’t feel safe about it. PunkBuster has been around for 10 years and almost single-handedly saved the multiplayer shooter genre from being torn apart by hackers and cheaters. In that time, we can’t find one instance of someone’s privacy being violated. EA has sold millions of copies of the Battlefield franchise all over the world, and 90% of BF players play on PB protected servers. In all that time, not one person has submitted a valid customer service complaint about a privacy or security violation. 2. Everyone concerned about privacy should read PunkBuster’s privacy policy at ........ Keep in mind that if PunkBuster betrayed even one gamer’s trust, people would stop using it, game makers would stop supporting it, and it would be the end of that business. It is in PunkBuster’s best interest to protect the privacy of its players. They have been doing that for 10 years now with millions of satisfied customers. 3. UO’s subscription fees will not be going up. 4. We haven’t decided what shard or shards will be non-PunkBuster yet. We want to see the results from the beta test first, as well as collect feedback. 5. As for performance, let me re-state... If beta testing proves that PunkBuster has performance issues for a large number of players, we will consider another anti-cheat solution. Beta testing should start in mid-July. 6. As for the screenshots, it will only take shots of the actual game screen window, not anything else on your desktop. And, it does that only rarely. This feature of PunkBuster is mostly used to verify cheats that turns walls invisible or somehow alter the battleground to the cheaters advantage. I hope that alleviates some of your concerns. I’m sure discussions and debate will continue, and we will continue to answer questions about this as often as we can. Meanwhile, as for that other announcement, the in-game story cycle is getting very close to the moment of revelation. The last few steps will be challenging, but I’m betting players see the future before the end of June. See you in Sosaria, Darkscribe __________________ Ultima Online: Tabbitha LOTR :Tabbitha Greywolfe Snowbourn The Shire Last edited by Tabbitha; 20-06-2006 at 04:10 PM.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Why wasn't Punkbuster released with UO?	Adam	UO News & Developer's posts	9	13-11-2007 06:45 PM
DEBATE!!!!!!!! Official "Loss of 3D Client" Concerns thread! (Please read first post)	Tabbitha	UO News & Developer's posts	16	28-03-2007 03:49 PM
More Concerns Answered by GM Spada	Tabbitha	UO News & Developer's posts	0	12-10-2006 06:54 AM
Wilki comments on a player's concerns with the Mythic deal	Adam	UO News & Developer's posts	3	03-07-2006 08:37 AM
From Wilki - Concerning the concerns about Punkbuster	Adam	UO News & Developer's posts	7	21-06-2006 09:47 AM