Who thinks Siege Perilous is a waste of time and resources?

Mercenary · 9th November 2006, 01:19 PM

Ahh, I see. I am quite tempted to xshard a char over to Origin to farm stuff with then bring back to Atlantic. We'll see though, I'll have to find some cheap xfer tokens, hehe.

**Maddux** · 9th November 2006, 01:30 PM

Imagine a Harrower guarded by 4 reds, and a shard afraid to pvp. Origin is a great opportunity to make some serious gold with very little risk. Origin is dominated by Bth during primetime hours. While Dynasty and their allies wait for Bth to goto bed or to work so they can comeout and do Felucca Spawns. Korh is the large trammie guild who is better known for farming monster spawns and trading bods with one and another. Korh had tried to stand up against Bth and was soundly defeated on the field, but what did they expect by having tamers wearing lrc suits try and fight raiders and pvpers.

Samhain · 9th November 2006, 02:33 PM

I have always looked at Siege as a good thing. I do not think it should be removed. Even if it was made "static" and not have any further updates, seperated from the other shards in some way, it would be better than not at all in my opinion. Even today, yeeeears after I started playing UO, I still log on to Siege before Atlantic or LA as a general rule.

I understand how things are, for the most part, and can see the sweeping changes problem. If there was a way to half please everyone, it would be better than no Siege, even if it meant Siege was permanantly as it is today.

Just one opinion

**Ezekiel** · 9th November 2006, 09:23 PM

I think that if there were more people on Siege, more people would go to Siege. Kind of a Catch #22

I certainly dont want to see it going anywhere. I figure there will come a time where the char I have on there will call to me...

Damin · 9th November 2006, 10:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tabbitha

[size="1"]

SanyaEAMythic
Director of Community

Stare. We're not deleting shards. The end.

HeHe. I like him.

**Maddux** · 10th November 2006, 03:00 AM

In the Corporate World, what a Developer says is often ignored by The Board Member. Its the profit margin that is heard above all else.

9th November 2006, 01:19 PM	#11
Mercenary i refuse to flex!! Join Date: Jul 2006 Shard: Atlantic Posts: 1,047 Gold: 57 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Who thinks Siege Perilous is a waste of time and resources? Ahh, I see. I am quite tempted to xshard a char over to Origin to farm stuff with then bring back to Atlantic. We'll see though, I'll have to find some cheap xfer tokens, hehe.

9th November 2006, 01:30 PM	#12
Maddux I've got Skinnies with RPGS! Twelve o'clock! Join Date: Jan 2006 Shard: Pacific Posts: 6,570 Gold: 17,624 Thanks: 14 Thanked 50 Times in 39 Posts	Re: Who thinks Siege Perilous is a waste of time and resources? Imagine a Harrower guarded by 4 reds, and a shard afraid to pvp. Origin is a great opportunity to make some serious gold with very little risk. Origin is dominated by Bth during primetime hours. While Dynasty and their allies wait for Bth to goto bed or to work so they can comeout and do Felucca Spawns. Korh is the large trammie guild who is better known for farming monster spawns and trading bods with one and another. Korh had tried to stand up against Bth and was soundly defeated on the field, but what did they expect by having tamers wearing lrc suits try and fight raiders and pvpers.

9th November 2006, 02:33 PM	#13
Samhain The Noble Paladin Join Date: Nov 2006 Shard: Atlantic Posts: 47 Gold: 1 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Who thinks Siege Perilous is a waste of time and resources? I have always looked at Siege as a good thing. I do not think it should be removed. Even if it was made "static" and not have any further updates, seperated from the other shards in some way, it would be better than not at all in my opinion. Even today, yeeeears after I started playing UO, I still log on to Siege before Atlantic or LA as a general rule. I understand how things are, for the most part, and can see the sweeping changes problem. If there was a way to half please everyone, it would be better than no Siege, even if it meant Siege was permanantly as it is today. Just one opinion More than any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly.

9th November 2006, 09:23 PM	#14
Ezekiel Wycorp--Dwarf Hunter Join Date: Jul 2005 Shard: Area 52 Posts: 2,504 Gold: 79 Thanks: 0 Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts	Re: Who thinks Siege Perilous is a waste of time and resources? I think that if there were more people on Siege, more people would go to Siege. Kind of a Catch #22 I certainly dont want to see it going anywhere. I figure there will come a time where the char I have on there will call to me...

10th November 2006, 03:00 AM	#16
Maddux I've got Skinnies with RPGS! Twelve o'clock! Join Date: Jan 2006 Shard: Pacific Posts: 6,570 Gold: 17,624 Thanks: 14 Thanked 50 Times in 39 Posts	Re: Who thinks Siege Perilous is a waste of time and resources? In the Corporate World, what a Developer says is often ignored by The Board Member. Its the profit margin that is heard above all else.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Wemen of Siege Perilous	Majere	Ultima Online General Discussion	2	2nd October 2007 10:25 AM
What is different about Siege Perilous?	Jakar	UO FAQ's	2	16th August 2007 11:10 AM
Siege Perilous - Where The Heck	Carl	Ultima Online General Discussion	6	7th January 2007 04:33 PM
Why can't i choose siege perilous	Fatboy103	Ultima Online General Discussion	6	5th December 2006 10:26 AM