Is this typical of the KR client?

RalenNacht · 27th November 2007, 12:11 AM

For the most part I have no problems with the KR client. I like the updated graphics and GUI.

I runs smooth and doesn't seem to dog out. However my major concern is with the fact that people on the 2D client simply outrun me.

I did a fairly simple test. My wife is on a 2.2ghz Duron with 512mb and on the 2D client. I'm on a 3ghz Athlon 64bit, with one gig of ram and a GF6800GT.

We started a foot race my wife maid it to the halfway point and back to the start before I even got to the halfway point.

If I didn't have the 2D client to comare it to I'd say there wasn't a freakn thing wrong with this client. But seeing that there is no way i would use the KR client in PvP you wouldn't be able to get away even on a mount vs unmounted player they could still keep up.

There is no way this client is ever going to be fixed. Especially with the neglect UO has already suffored.

Oh well.

**Solidchrome** · 27th November 2007, 10:12 AM

2D is slightly quicker because of the simple graphics. I believe KR will run quicker after the next update.

Welcome to UO forums btw

27th November 2007, 12:11 AM	#1
RalenNacht Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 8 Gold: 51 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Is this typical of the KR client? For the most part I have no problems with the KR client. I like the updated graphics and GUI. I runs smooth and doesn't seem to dog out. However my major concern is with the fact that people on the 2D client simply outrun me. I did a fairly simple test. My wife is on a 2.2ghz Duron with 512mb and on the 2D client. I'm on a 3ghz Athlon 64bit, with one gig of ram and a GF6800GT. We started a foot race my wife maid it to the halfway point and back to the start before I even got to the halfway point. If I didn't have the 2D client to comare it to I'd say there wasn't a freakn thing wrong with this client. But seeing that there is no way i would use the KR client in PvP you wouldn't be able to get away even on a mount vs unmounted player they could still keep up. There is no way this client is ever going to be fixed. Especially with the neglect UO has already suffored. Oh well.

27th November 2007, 10:12 AM	#2
Solidchrome † Virtual hero- real life geek † Join Date: Jul 2007 Shard: europa Posts: 1,046 Gold: 216 My Mood: Thanks: 64 Thanked 76 Times in 41 Posts	Re: Is this typical of the KR client? 2D is slightly quicker because of the simple graphics. I believe KR will run quicker after the next update. Welcome to UO forums btw Tovladian Soltyr- "..then I saw it was Solid and I was like "Ah ok" because we all know he's not the most complete box of crayons.." UOForums Need Your Donations- Click Here

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Why is the 2d client using 90% of my cpu?	ROFLjuice	Ultima Online General Discussion	3	6th January 2008 07:46 PM
Typical /rant	callumf	Lord of the Rings Online General Discussion	10	27th December 2007 09:30 AM
I'm new to KR and I like the client but a ?	hpmcbroom	Ultima Online General Discussion	4	2nd July 2007 03:45 PM
is there any way you can get the download client for the samurai empire client??	dragonlancex	Ultima Online General Discussion	4	4th November 2006 10:46 PM
A Typical Day for CatHat	Thradia	UO News & Developer's posts	9	8th February 2006 10:27 PM