So what would have been better than trammel?

**Vepl** · 6th June 2007, 07:04 AM

*shudders*

Oh

Vepl

Ziggy Stardust · 6th June 2007, 07:05 AM

well..... there you have it...

**Adri** · 6th June 2007, 07:07 AM

Aside from champs, the only time I run into people in fel is if I am hunting in a somewhat popular area.

Sandra Lee · 6th June 2007, 07:11 AM

Been in Fel the last 8 years. Occasionally (read .... summer vacation) I might run into a few people other than guildmates, but in general no one is bothersome. I am not quick to jump, normally try to have a bit of conversation, finish whatever I am doing, wish 'em luck on my way out (even if that means going out of my way to find them sometimes). Just being neighborly for the most part.

I don't go to the Yew Moongate though.

Mikhail Amarese · 6th June 2007, 01:12 PM

I thought Siege was the boogieman.

I'm still fighting the urge to make an alt there. The ruleset is vastly appealing, but I have a feeling I'd miss all my goodies on LS and that the pros would take one look at me and laugh me off the shard.

Edit to stay on topic - I figure they didn't do new ruleset shards due to the logistics of moving everyone's characters and such - that was way back in the MMO infancy days really, before that sort of stuff was really commonplace or probably easy. Trammel was likely the best "business" decision at the time. Had the split been a current-day thing, I think we would have seen Fel shards and Tram shards, since nowadays mass character moves are easier to pull off. Personally, I think the game could benefit even now from this sort of action.

Ziggy Stardust · 6th June 2007, 01:24 PM

On Siege one must keep a eye on the blue .. reds are not a bother for the most part on Siege

CheesePlant · 7th June 2007, 06:52 AM

I like the idea of server migration into two servers but its never going to happen, I dowt EA will ever fund twice as many servers as there is now. I like RPing and just waring with other guilds. It gives me my piece of PVP bread and I like to eat it! Good from both worlds.

However in games like wow I always loved the pvp servers

6th June 2007, 07:04 AM	#21
Vepl Forum Legend Join Date: Oct 2006 Shard: Lake Superior Posts: 3,645 Gold: 510 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? shudders Oh Vepl Another Quality Job by Atlas607 Member of K*S

6th June 2007, 07:05 AM	#22
Ziggy Stardust Join Date: Sep 2006 Shard: Lake Superior.. the only shard in the system..hehe Posts: 117 Gold: 51 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? well..... there you have it...

6th June 2007, 07:07 AM	#23
Adri Wearing metal panties in a lightning storm Join Date: May 2004 Shard: Pacific/Landroval Posts: 3,748 Gold: 633 My Mood: Thanks: 139 Thanked 71 Times in 49 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 2	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? Aside from champs, the only time I run into people in fel is if I am hunting in a somewhat popular area. We are all broken and wounded in this world. Some choose to grow strong at the broken places. --Harold J. Duarte-Bernhardt Thanks to Atlas for the fantastic sig!

6th June 2007, 07:11 AM	#24
Sandra Lee Mists of Avalon Join Date: Apr 2005 Shard: Catskills Posts: 409 Gold: 51 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? Been in Fel the last 8 years. Occasionally (read .... summer vacation) I might run into a few people other than guildmates, but in general no one is bothersome. I am not quick to jump, normally try to have a bit of conversation, finish whatever I am doing, wish 'em luck on my way out (even if that means going out of my way to find them sometimes). Just being neighborly for the most part. I don't go to the Yew Moongate though. Sandra Lee Mists of Avalon

6th June 2007, 01:12 PM	#25
Mikhail Amarese Join Date: May 2007 Shard: Lake Superior Posts: 16 Gold: 0 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? I thought Siege was the boogieman. I'm still fighting the urge to make an alt there. The ruleset is vastly appealing, but I have a feeling I'd miss all my goodies on LS and that the pros would take one look at me and laugh me off the shard. Edit to stay on topic - I figure they didn't do new ruleset shards due to the logistics of moving everyone's characters and such - that was way back in the MMO infancy days really, before that sort of stuff was really commonplace or probably easy. Trammel was likely the best "business" decision at the time. Had the split been a current-day thing, I think we would have seen Fel shards and Tram shards, since nowadays mass character moves are easier to pull off. Personally, I think the game could benefit even now from this sort of action. Last edited by Mikhail Amarese; 6th June 2007 at 01:18 PM.

6th June 2007, 01:24 PM	#26
Ziggy Stardust Join Date: Sep 2006 Shard: Lake Superior.. the only shard in the system..hehe Posts: 117 Gold: 51 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? On Siege one must keep a eye on the blue .. reds are not a bother for the most part on Siege

7th June 2007, 06:52 AM	#27
CheesePlant Pie eater Join Date: Oct 2006 Shard: Europa Posts: 107 Gold: 5 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what would have been better than trammel? I like the idea of server migration into two servers but its never going to happen, I dowt EA will ever fund twice as many servers as there is now. I like RPing and just waring with other guilds. It gives me my piece of PVP bread and I like to eat it! Good from both worlds. However in games like wow I always loved the pvp servers

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Trammel	Dryax	UO Ideas and Suggestions	88	21st July 2008 12:08 AM
Trammel Moonstone	RMS Carpathia	UO Rares	23	20th May 2008 08:00 AM
Fel and Trammel ???	mystery323x	Ultima Online General Discussion	2	9th July 2007 03:06 PM
Looking for Felucca or Trammel Keep	Vindicator	Sonoma	2	31st July 2006 02:22 PM
Looking for Pre-Trammel fix?	Lensky Entreri	Spam forum	0	6th February 2006 11:04 AM