So what we actually got?

Aquila · 2nd August 2007, 08:46 AM

Well we got KR client which isn't good enought like it should be. It has many nice things but it's not good enought to be game which is released 2007. KR don't run on many systems either those comps are too old or some other problems, example graphic card. KR is laggy and slower than UO 2d

UO 2d nowdays. I would say some areas which looked fine before in 2d are now a bit ruined because tiles have changed. 2d has also started lagging, spiking or whatever. moving isn't as smooth as it used to be. I love UO and it's 2d client which i love. I don't care about old 3d client but ya many got unhappy when it got removed (it was worse than KR) but still it made many unhappy. now most like 2d client and now it's also getting ruined.

So I think dev team own us who have played UO for long that they still would develope 2d client atleast so it wont get to bad direction like its going now.
something NEED to be done. I'm not sure if KR can ever be good enought so even 50% would play it. it has many nice things which atract but still would say 50% for sure prefer for 2d client. more may change to KR/SA because they wanna test/see/feel new features/lands/races but it doesn't mean they would like it more in long run.

PLEASE FIX SMOOTHES OF MOVING AND BAD TILES IN 2D CLIENT.

Serdan · 3rd August 2007, 02:53 AM

UO's longevity is due to the fact the 2D game is really fun to play.

Little things like flicking the pages in books and spellbooks. Being able to move things around in your bags wherever you want to, the wonderful sound effects as you clomp around and open bags and draws.

Basically with 2D you feel you really are part of the world, and this makes RP very enjoyable.

The new KR is lifeless.

Totally lifeless.

2D has been around for 10 years for a reason. It did not need changing, and so it should not be replaced. KR is a different product, and a poor one at that. Bottom line is I would NOT go out and buy KR if it were to be sold like UO is at present.

Aquila · 3rd August 2007, 08:14 AM

ya KR is more like a game and 2d is that + more. im really mad that they ruined some tiles in the world + made it lag more than it used to be.

2nd August 2007, 08:46 AM	#1
Aquila Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 82 Gold: 210 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	So what we actually got? Well we got KR client which isn't good enought like it should be. It has many nice things but it's not good enought to be game which is released 2007. KR don't run on many systems either those comps are too old or some other problems, example graphic card. KR is laggy and slower than UO 2d UO 2d nowdays. I would say some areas which looked fine before in 2d are now a bit ruined because tiles have changed. 2d has also started lagging, spiking or whatever. moving isn't as smooth as it used to be. I love UO and it's 2d client which i love. I don't care about old 3d client but ya many got unhappy when it got removed (it was worse than KR) but still it made many unhappy. now most like 2d client and now it's also getting ruined. So I think dev team own us who have played UO for long that they still would develope 2d client atleast so it wont get to bad direction like its going now. something NEED to be done. I'm not sure if KR can ever be good enought so even 50% would play it. it has many nice things which atract but still would say 50% for sure prefer for 2d client. more may change to KR/SA because they wanna test/see/feel new features/lands/races but it doesn't mean they would like it more in long run. PLEASE FIX SMOOTHES OF MOVING AND BAD TILES IN 2D CLIENT.

3rd August 2007, 02:53 AM	#2
Serdan Join Date: Jun 2007 Posts: 12 Gold: 1 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what we actually got? UO's longevity is due to the fact the 2D game is really fun to play. Little things like flicking the pages in books and spellbooks. Being able to move things around in your bags wherever you want to, the wonderful sound effects as you clomp around and open bags and draws. Basically with 2D you feel you really are part of the world, and this makes RP very enjoyable. The new KR is lifeless. Totally lifeless. 2D has been around for 10 years for a reason. It did not need changing, and so it should not be replaced. KR is a different product, and a poor one at that. Bottom line is I would NOT go out and buy KR if it were to be sold like UO is at present. Last edited by Serdan; 3rd August 2007 at 02:56 AM.

3rd August 2007, 08:14 AM	#3
Aquila Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 82 Gold: 210 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: So what we actually got? ya KR is more like a game and 2d is that + more. im really mad that they ruined some tiles in the world + made it lag more than it used to be.