A request to EA

8th January 2006, 12:13 PM

kk will do.

may take a bit im going afk.

Flutter · 8th January 2006, 01:30 PM

Nevermind all that he has 100% packet loss to at&t which is where his problems are.

8th January 2006, 01:31 PM

Here we go

Quote:

Host Name IP Address Hop Ping Time Ping Avg % Loss Pkts r/s Ping best/worst
launchmodem ***.***.*.*** 1 0ms 0ms 0% 92 / 92 0ms / 0ms
* Unknown Host * 68.152.190.225 2 46ms 50ms 0% 92 / 92 44ms / 386ms
* Unknown Host * 68.152.190.193 3 45ms 51ms 0% 92 / 92 44ms / 387ms
* Unknown Host * 205.152.190.29 4 45ms 50ms 0% 92 / 92 44ms / 368ms
* Unknown Host * 65.83.237.186 5 58ms 61ms 0% 92 / 92 53ms / 387ms
pxr00asm-1-0-0.bellsouth.net 65.83.236.4 6 57ms 62ms 0% 92 / 92 54ms / 387ms
so-1-0-0.gar1.Atlanta1.Level3.net67.72.8.5 7 77ms 75ms 0% 92 / 92 67ms / 405ms
ae-1-51.bbr1.Atlanta1.Level3.net 4.68.103.1 8 70ms 76ms 0% 92 / 92 67ms / 406ms
ae-2-0.bbr1.Washington1.Level3.ne4.68.128.201 9 82ms 86ms 0% 92 / 92 78ms / 407ms
ae-13-51.car3.Washington1.Level3.4.68.121.16 10 109ms 88ms 0% 92 / 92 79ms / 425ms
telia-gw.n54ny.ip.att.net 192.205.32.49 11 83ms 88ms 0% 92 / 92 82ms / 415ms
* Unknown Host * 12.122.80.229 12 123ms 100% 0 / 92
tbr1-cl4.sl9mo.ip.att.net 12.122.10.30 13 129ms 100% 0 / 92
tbr2-cl2.sffca.ip.att.net 12.122.10.42 14 127ms 100% 0 / 90
tbr1011401.sffca.ip.att.net 12.122.13.85 15 127ms 100% 0 / 90
gar1-p370.sn1ca.ip.att.net 12.123.195.214 16 124ms 100% 0 / 90
* Unknown Host * 12.119.139.10 17 142ms 144ms 0% 90 / 90 117ms / 463ms
edge02.eqx-sjc.ea.com 159.153.192.5 18 161ms 150ms 0% 90 / 90 122ms / 476ms
fert02.abn-sjc.ea.com 159.153.192.227 19 148ms 146ms 0% 90 / 90 118ms / 460ms
central-aw4.owo.com 159.153.209.42 20 150ms 151ms 1% 89 / 90 124ms / 479ms

**Adam** · 8th January 2006, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flutter

Nevermind all that he has 100% packet loss to at&t which is where his problems are.

That's not entirely true
Some routers are programmed to ignore ping requests, which is why you'll allways get 100% loss

The problem he has, is at his ISP's end, imo
Might be worth emailing it to wilki for advice

Flutter · 8th January 2006, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deimos

That's not entirely true
Some routers are programmed to ignore ping requests, which is why you'll allways get 100% loss
The problem he has, is at his ISP's end, imo
Might be worth emailing it to wilki for advice

I can ping those AT&T IP#'s just fine. I average about 22 ms and 0 packetloss to the at&t servers he has 100% packet loss to.
Time to call your IP and tell them they need to change your route.

**Ezekiel** · 8th January 2006, 02:47 PM

OK, Cobra tell me you are NOT on cable. If you are, call and canel it today because that is themost horrible conn Ive ever seen....ever. If its DSL, youre in too far from a switching station or something. Youre pingto the second hop should absolutely never be spiking to near 400ms.

Flutter, Pinging and Polling seem to yield different results as far as the 100% loss goes. The data must be tagged different so that the router/node knows whom to ignore and when.

As far as calling your ISP to arrange a different route, youve a better chance at walking on water.

**Adam** · 8th January 2006, 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kettlewhistle78

Flutter, Pinging and Polling seem to yield different results as far as the 100% loss goes. The data must be tagged different so that the router/node knows whom to ignore and when.

Yep, it depends on who's pinging , which determines wether it responds or not
I get 100% loss

IF the router was faulty, he would get high packet loss on all hops after those "Faulty" ones.
It's the ISP imo

The second hop on your route is usually the Cable/DSL cabinet in your street, so you should get at MOST 10-20?ms response time?
I get 10ms to my 2nd hop, I also get 100% loss on 6 hops to Atlantic, but I get zero lag.

Flutter · 8th January 2006, 02:49 PM

Strange I have had my cable co change my route for me before...

**Queen Mum** · 8th January 2006, 02:53 PM

Shouldn't this be in the Gameplay Feedback Forum where it would get more attention by the UO/EA members who do come here? If it is to 'rant' about pvp isn't that what the special PvP Discussion Forum is for? So it gets heard by those who can participate in helping make a change.

Even I as a non fighter knows that they (EA/UO) are working diligently and as fast as possible to upgrade the pvp'rs playing ... thats what the next publish is all about. They keep reminding us to go onto the pvpr test shard to help them achieve what we want as that type of player.
So, I'm not really sure what is expected by trying to point out what is already known and is being worked on.

As for ping and stuff ... Our family plays Sonoma, and we are NOT having the lagging issues that you are havibg ~ and we are situated in Alaska and in Wisconsin ~ so we are not near the main server.

**Ezekiel** · 8th January 2006, 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flutter

Strange I have had my cable co change my route for me before...

Hmmm, maybe you live in a city? It has always been relay to me that the only way to change the route is change ISPs...

8th January 2006, 12:13 PM	#31
Chris Guest Posts: n/a Gold: 0 [Check]	Re: A request to EA kk will do. may take a bit im going afk.

8th January 2006, 02:47 PM	#36
Ezekiel Wycorp--Dwarf Hunter Join Date: Jul 2005 Shard: Area 52 Posts: 2,433 Gold: 95 Thanks: 0 Thanked 8 Times in 6 Posts	Re: A request to EA OK, Cobra tell me you are NOT on cable. If you are, call and canel it today because that is themost horrible conn Ive ever seen....ever. If its DSL, youre in too far from a switching station or something. Youre pingto the second hop should absolutely never be spiking to near 400ms. Flutter, Pinging and Polling seem to yield different results as far as the 100% loss goes. The data must be tagged different so that the router/node knows whom to ignore and when. As far as calling your ISP to arrange a different route, youve a better chance at walking on water.

8th January 2006, 02:53 PM	#39
Queen Mum Lead Administrator Join Date: Mar 2005 Shard: Sonoma Posts: 3,063 Gold: 22,138 My Mood: Blog Entries: 20 Thanks: 145 Thanked 301 Times in 122 Posts Awards Showcase Total Awards: 2	Re: A request to EA Shouldn't this be in the Gameplay Feedback Forum where it would get more attention by the UO/EA members who do come here? If it is to 'rant' about pvp isn't that what the special PvP Discussion Forum is for? So it gets heard by those who can participate in helping make a change. Even I as a non fighter knows that they (EA/UO) are working diligently and as fast as possible to upgrade the pvp'rs playing ... thats what the next publish is all about. They keep reminding us to go onto the pvpr test shard to help them achieve what we want as that type of player. So, I'm not really sure what is expected by trying to point out what is already known and is being worked on. As for ping and stuff ... Our family plays Sonoma, and we are NOT having the lagging issues that you are havibg ~ and we are situated in Alaska and in Wisconsin ~ so we are not near the main server.

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Signiture Request	Tyran Khaal	Europa RP General	2	9th November 2006 01:14 PM
help request	woody	Ultima Online General Discussion	4	22nd June 2006 02:17 PM