| |||||||
| UO News & Developer's posts Here you'll find the latest updates for UO and posts by EA/UO reps from Stratics |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #11 |
| Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 52
Gold: 5 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() | Re: Grimm comments on dirty undergarments In days of old, when knights were bold, and toilets wern't yet invented.......... folks back then had little to no options on their garments..... especially the undergarments. Wool for most folks, like the commoners. The elite got a cloth made from plant fibers, i cant remember what it was called, but it was very expensive. Silk was around, but wasn't very common and also was very expensive. Leather/hides were still commonly used. For the most part, underware looked like it does on the paperdolls, rolled up lengths of cloth, loin cloth fashion, for those that bothered. |
| | |
| | #12 | ||
| Guest | Re: Grimm comments on dirty undergarments Quote:
Quote:
-Grimm | ||
|
| | #13 |
| I Poke Dots Join Date: Apr 2005 Shard: Sonoma
Posts: 363
Gold: 81 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Grimm comments on dirty undergarments i might be the only person here, hell possiblt the game that thinks the 2d paperdolls.. underwear etc.. are ok as they are.. its not like anyone runs around naked in game when they are anywhere ourside of brit/luna that would just be silly.. i could see the need to whiten them up a bit but still i think there are other things which could be improved than the underwear.. (ridghebacks/wyrums/etc...) o i could also see makeing the female characters look more female in items such as robes/dressed/shirts/leather armour/etc... in game being a good thing as well.. i hate it when guys come up to me and say 'excuse me sir' (whats even more ironic,playing on one of my male characters i had someone come up to me and say 'excuse me my lady') ohyea i also noticed somewhing with the male kimodo i think the other day *searches to see if she got a ss of it* it was messed up in places on someone's paperdoll.. nope i cant find the picture it had rips through it.. *shrug* ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Pretty Nice Disguise, isn't it? Join Date: Nov 2005 Shard: Lake Superior
Posts: 1,126
Gold: 14 Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() | Re: Grimm comments on dirty undergarments My ladies are wearing dyed spined leather pants that I made. Is that not 'traditional' leather style? It happened when the Elves were introduced and was never there until the paperdoll was updated for the Elven characters. Being called male bothers me too. It happens more when we wear normal leather instead of the skirt and bustier, but it even happens with those on. I think some people just assume most players are male. I try to always look at the paperdoll before I speak, but now with the hoods and all covering robes, it can be impossible to determine unless they have a Lord or Lady title. Still, if our clothing LOOKED female more of the time..... For instance, I love chainmail, but would love to look female in it as well. Also, chainmail and ringmail both need some sort of 'boot' ... They just doesn't look right with any of the leather shoes, boots or sandals. ![]() ~ "It's definitely a Bubble Bath Day.". ~ Dove Promise ~ |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I'll keep you my dirty little secret | Snugglebunny | Bunny Burrow | 3 | 3rd November 2006 06:25 AM |
| Grimm & CatHat Comment on the Art Changes | Thradia | UO News & Developer's posts | 0 | 30th January 2006 05:48 PM |
| Grimm Introduces CatHat | Thradia | UO News & Developer's posts | 3 | 21st December 2005 11:04 PM |
| More from Grimm on Art Changes | Thradia | UO News & Developer's posts | 0 | 29th September 2005 04:18 PM |
| Grimm - Reasons for Changing Some of the Creatures | Thradia | UO News & Developer's posts | 8 | 29th September 2005 05:25 AM |